Find a Lawyer

MST. ASIFA BIBI versus STATE

Section (b) the definition of evidence, the charge of conviction, the heroin reduction allegedly recovered from the accused in the case of a thousand grams fall, the case against the accused, Section B (b) of the Narcotic Substances Act of 1997 The accused, who was a woman, was no ex-offender nor had any prior history of drug involvement nor was the prosecution filed against the accused as a prosecution. That the allegations against the accused were substantiated, there was no enmity between the accused and the complainant or other witnesses of the prosecution. In the case, the lawyer for the accused did not seriously challenge the accused's conviction and the state solicitor praying for the lesser sentence had no objection to the quantum of punishment, under Section 9 (b) of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997 The punishment for the accused was reduced to three years \ RI was reduced accordingly with section 382B, CR PC and benefit amount \ r \ n family advocate from Shakargarh lawyer