ALI AKBAR ALIAS PAPPU versus STATE
The testimony of Section 302 (b) was not available on the testimony of any witness who benefited from the doubt. The accused was not named in the case and he was involved in a case which was not made by one of the accused witnesses, Mentioned. Due to the alleged extra-judicial confession of the accused before and after the victim's death, which was not confirmed by any other independent evidence, the medical evidence, in the absence of any general account of the incident, should be taken to the accused. Did not associate with the crime. The rifle, which was allegedly not sent to the forensic science laboratory by the accused, was of no use to the prosecution. The evidence on the record was not sufficient to warrant a warrant. had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Dhirkot lawyer
