NADIR versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 440/34 Guarantee, no further date or incident was mentioned in the grant FIR No one was cited in the AR. The accused was allegedly convicted by the accused and did not come under the prohibited clause; the perpetrators were never convicted in the pending cases against them. One of the accused was a 60/65 year old man who confessed to the police officer present in the court that no articles were found on the accused's offer during the interrogation and submitted a case for further investigation in favor of the accused. The challan had already been presented to the court. The accused was no longer wanted for investigative purposes. No motive could be served in the custody. In cases arising out of the section 497, CRPC prohibition clause, the grant of bail was a rule, while the refusal was exempt but the accused, in the circumstances, was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Matli lawyer
