MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Section 12 and 54 of the Civil Procedure (v. 1908), section 115 suit for the specific performance of the contract and for a permanent injunction were in the case of the plaintiff that the defendants thereby agreed to sell the land to him. Had received a large amount of money and it was agreed that payment would be made upon confirmation of the change in the rest of the sale. The plaintiff alleges that the plaintiff sued for consideration in favor of another defendant. The land is sold despite the fact that they are bound to sue the applicant. The alleged advance payment by the plaintiff was not paid by the plaintiff and there was no evidence that a defendant was eligible to take action on behalf of the defendant, the appellate court ruled in this case. Certifying that no oral contract had been made in the dispute proved to be a sale of property, nor that a contingent payment was established in the exercise of its revised jurisdiction by the following courts. The High Court cannot be interfered with as the powers of the High Court were limited under Section 115, the High Court And could not interfere with the exercise of powers under section 115, CPC, even if the finding of the courts below was incorrect
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Hayatabad lawyer