NAVEED MASIH versus STATE
Sections 497 and 164 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 36363/6 37V bail, Victim's Grant was taken into custody by the police while traveling on the platform of the railway station and presented to the Magistrate, where he filed the section. 164, stated in its statement under CR PC. Negative story of the abduction, but his own statement was told to leave the victim's home - his second statement was later filed under section 164 under, the CCP alleges that the kidnapping and Zena's commission, its Medical reports on the fact that the hymen infected man was easily torn from two healed tears and two fingers of the vagina, which showed a woman showing ease of involvement in Victim sexual activity, The sole statement of the victim, in the absence of strong seriousness, could not be relied upon was the real cause of the victim's stepfather. The disturbance, against which the victim had requested the police to initiate criminal proceedings, the Victim once again left his home and could not be traced, the accused was granted bail under conditions \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer