Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MANSHA versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) accused of defining evidence was named in the FIR immediately recorded for being an accused; false allegations by the complainant as to the case of a single accused. No question could be raised as to why, the complainant had given full details of the incident. In a very natural way and was supported by an independent eyewitness. Eye testimony was not a material contradiction; medical evidence fully confirmed the eye witness's account, in which case there was no penalty for a minor conviction of weakness or absence of purpose. Death to the accused did not guarantee any interference and was maintained in the circumstances tax advocates from Ranipur lawyer