Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TANVIR versus MUHAMMAD ARIF

Section 2302 / Cri 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) appealed against the acquittal at night and according to the F1R the accused was unknown, the complainant in his supplementary statement The accused was introduced in the case. The eyewitness was associated with the deceased, not a natural witness who made the opposite statement to the police, and made many corrections during his statement before the trial court made reference to the incident. The trial court found by the witnesses to be grossly unacceptable and they failed to impress the trust Wejatkar's evidence Recovering a gun from the arrest of the accused was unnatural and unreliable, legally because it It was not that the extra-judicial vacancy did not matter. The confession was committed by the co-accused and not by the accused himself. Medical evidence was contradictory at the time of the incident. The trial court had properly acquitted the accused by eyewitnesses, and accordingly the appeal was summarily dismissed. immigration advocates from Topi lawyer