Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE

Article 230/4 364/2 2 Q, Law Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Definition of Section 7 Evidence Failing to be Nominated in FIR Last seen United Nations delayed joint confession of crime. The final evidence was recorded by the police just two months after the disappearance of the accused, both the accused were convicted by the trial court for murder and they were sentenced to death, in the course of the trial. The prosecutor did not present an FIR to establish the motive behind the incident. Prosecutors testified during the testimony that the accused were not named in the trial and in fact the accused had nothing to do with the crime, while the prosecution failed to prove the motive behind the incident during the trial. The witness witnesses appeared before the police and filed their statement under section 161 crore. About two months after the PC's disappearance, such witnesses could not provide any plausible reasoning in their testimony, not contacting the police or the complainant earlier, and thus the testimony presented by the witness. Was not beyond doubt and the confession made by the accused was in fact a joint confession made in the presence of the police. His acceptance was highly questionable, the prosecution failed to bring the accused's crime home and the trial court sentenced the accused and both the accused were acquitted. Appeal was allowed in the situation. immigration advocates contact from Upper Deval lawyer