GHULAM ABBAS versus STATE
The testimony of Section 302 (b) was promptly reported to the police, the post-mortem report confirmed the ocular account was completely confirmed by the fact that the weapon of crime was not blood-stained or sent to the Chemical Examiner. , Because it didn't matter. Evidence of recovery was merely a piece of evidence that appeared in the light of day. Eyewitnesses fully justified their presence on the occasion at the relevant time, the case was solely of the accused, the victim was an extraordinary case, the complainant was the victim's real son, it is not believed that The original culprit has been acquitted and did not affect the conviction given by the accused to occupy the mansion version only and the death sentence of the culprits was maintained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Kashmore lawyer