Section 302 (b) / 34 of the evidence, the testimony of the evidence was not consistent with the medical evidence of the prosecution's evidence when the defendant was attacked and the accused's five witnesses were present on the spot. Were walking around. The victim, but he remained silent, neither did he resist the accused party, nor saved the victim, nor tried to flee the spot and took immediate defensive measures to protect his own life, which Was very skeptical and did not appeal to anyone. The complainant had concealed material facts through litigation, which was neither reliable nor trustworthy, much more attractive to the defense's request. It was not known that the complaining party, along with several persons who entered the disputed persons, was the most attractive factor in this matter. Yes. Land forcibly occupying it; and they mistreated the first victim's brother, firing which he lost on the spot, the prosecution only examined interested witnesses, who were Harry and the driver of the victim. Were the ones who hid important facts in the FIR and stopped their statements before the police prosecution. Failure to prove the allegation of being involved in the house on a charge of trusting and affecting the trust, beyond any doubt, the false implications of the ten accused cannot be ignored in strange circumstances; It was decided largely that aside, all the accused were acquitted of the charges and were ordered to be released, giving them the benefit of the doubt.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
