Find a Lawyer

ABDUL REHMAN versus STATE

The offense of bail under the prohibition clause of section 497 (1) section 497 (1), had no legal or moral imperative to keep the people in jail merely on the charge that they were sentenced to death, life. Sentenced to a year or ten years. Unless a reasonable basis is disclosed in which the complexity is revealed. An offender can be exempted from the wrongful conviction by the ultimate punishment and imprisonment error, but no innocent return can be offered to any innocent person because of his imprisonment. Matter in spite of its success in the long run

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• PAKISTAN MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. v. SINDH REVENUE BOARD 2014 PTD 2048
• ABDUL MAJEED v. State 2014 YLR 2050
• Haji MUHAMMAD v. State 2014 YLR 2061
• CRYSTAL ENTERPRISES v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PTD 2073
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. State 2014 YLR 2091
• SIKANDAR v. State 2014 YLR 2128
• RAZA MUHAMMAD SHAH v. State 2014 YLR 2134
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. State 2014 PTD 2140

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocates from Doaaba lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes