MIAN NASIM AKHTAR versus MST. SHAMIM JAHAN BEGUM
O XLIII, R 1 Respondents' order appealed that it would have no objection if the non-binding decree was canceled, but seeking to protect the rights of the defendants, they said that the property under the property was to be granted. By no means should you be allowed to be a stranger. During the appellant's counsel's claim to accept the respondent's counsel counsel's submission for the applicants, it was stated that the suit property was not separated from the court, to ensure that the appellant was deprived of justice. Yes, it is directed that the Appellant provide details of profit / rent etc. Accordingly, he has been acquiring the trial court with immovable property under a fixed term order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Mangal Sada lawyer
