MASOOD HUSSAIN SHAH versus STATE
In his first statement filed under Section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 65 BBB Guarantee, Section 646464, the CRPC apologized to the accused, saying that he had, in his free will and consent, She is married and did not abduct her. But in a subsequent statement recorded before the magistrate, he was trapped by the offender with the commission of the crime, before the magistrate confirmed the abductor, before the abductor's medical examination Had revealed that he was addicted to homosexuality. Prior to the incident, the credibility of the kidnapper could not be relied upon in the context of controversial and controversial statements, which were neither credible nor the trustworthy defendant, First Fax, who was not involved in the commission of the crime. had gone. The right to freedom cannot be jeopardized; further investigation into the crime of the accused is required. The accused was admitted on bail under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Manga Mandi lawyer
