RASHID ARMS COMPANY THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION
Sections 25 and 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Submission The authority to assess the cost of customs based on the advice of the appraisal was that the price advice under section 25A of the Customs Act, 1969, Was released by the source. Applicants have argued that such and similar pricing advice issued by the authorities was not mentioned in section 25A of the Customs Act, 1969, before this time legal action could be taken. Is. In several petitions of the Customs Act, 1969 by the High Court, the Authority issued an order for illegal assessment; he was the Deputy Director, but Section 25A of the Customs Act, 1969 did not authorize any Deputy Director to issue such directive. Assigned or not assigned. The order of such assessment may be issued by the collector customs on their own motion or on the reference given by the director of the customs value to any of the followers. n The deputy directors do not know anywhere in Section 25A of the Customs Act, 1969, the constitutional application was allowed in such a way that the default price was canceled on the basis of the judgment of illegal prices, the customs authorities neglecting the goods. We will evaluate the maintenance of this equipment. Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
