Find a Lawyer

ASHFAQ AHMED versus STATE

Article 302/148/149 The value of the evidence and the punishment for sudden provocation in the grave, the lack of evidence on record completely proved that the incident took place in the defendant's home and not the claimant's defense elsewhere. That the two were injured were confirmed in full by the accused in the back of the doctors' statements, the Medico Legal Report and the post-mortem report, which recovered the pistol from the suspect, the investigating officer and the prosecution witnesses. Gave full testimony, against which there was no corruption or misconduct, the accused defense charged the victim with another thief. He tried another to end the prosecution's case, accusing his injuries, but he couldn't prove it and the story turned out to be a testimony to the prosecutor because the defendant deliberately suppressed the cause. Had given. The murder of the motive by the prosecution, though it is believed that it has not been proven, will not play a role in the circumstances of the case, nor was it always necessary for the prosecution to prove the accused. And in the particular case, the prosecution was not obliged to prove that the ocular evidence was credible when its statement was specifically charged under section 342, CR. The PC, who had molested the deceased and prevented his mother from coming to his house on suspicion of having illicit relations with his mother, may have been enraged if he saw the accused again at his residence. And likewise, an unknown and just 20-year-old assaulted the deceased under provocation. There was no previous rivalry between the parties. Its their online advocate from Gujrat lawyer