UMAR SHARIF versus HAMID SIDDIQUE
A. XXXVIII, R 8 Investigating a Claim Attachment Before the Decision The applicant purchased his property after being attached by the court before the judgment and during the trial, the applicant claimed to be the owner of the property. The application was filed in question, under O XXXVIII, R 8, which was dismissed without an inquiry, the CPC had to approach the property attached before the judgment, only if the inquiry should be made. , Where the facts were affirmed by one party and denied by the other. The party was on record to clearly state the undisclosed material holdings that the property was enclosed in a suit and it was illegal to sell any transaction thereafter, therefore, no inquiry was required. , The High Court refused to interfere with the trial court's revised order. Dismiss in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Kalam lawyer
