Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

UMAR SHARIF versus HAMID SIDDIQUE


A. XXXVIII, R 8 Investigating a Claim Attachment Before the Decision The applicant purchased his property after being attached by the court before the judgment and during the trial, the applicant claimed to be the owner of the property. The application was filed in question, under O XXXVIII, R 8, which was dismissed without an inquiry, the CPC had to approach the property attached before the judgment, only if the inquiry should be made. , Where the facts were affirmed by one party and denied by the other. The party was on record to clearly state the undisclosed material holdings that the property was enclosed in a suit and it was illegal to sell any transaction thereafter, therefore, no inquiry was required. , The High Court refused to interfere with the trial court's revised order. Dismiss in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Khushab lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.