Find a Lawyer

SHAMS-UD-DIN versus THE STATE THROUGH DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION-F.B.R., LAHORE

Section 156 (90) and 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Assessment of Constitutional Application Duty Decision Officer, ordered that the total seizure order of goods was partially allowed in appeal in such a way that a fine of 30 fine The goods were allowed to be released on payment of the same, in this case the word confiscation, which in the light of the law is the authenticity of the order which was applicable and is intended to give the reviewing authority general and Unlimited jurisdiction was not provided. To determine where the announced price was not properly assessed, and market factors clearly make it clear that the announced and assessed price is still ridiculously low, Jurisdiction can not be termed legal if it is the same. If this factor is proved, it is intended to deprive it of its shareholding income, which is suspected that the value of the raw material of the product is higher than the value of the finished product. As is wrong, the department's major responsibility is to determine the cost of goods by adopting the methods provided under Section 25, Customs Act, 1969 High Court. The use of jurisdiction was confirmed by the collector but repudiated the notion that a subsequent assessment could be made on the basis of the assessment the constitutional request was dealt with accordingly. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Naukot lawyer