Find a Lawyer

AFZAL KHAN versus STATE

Sections 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 408, 420, 468, 471 and Section 5, 12 of the Ordinance (IX of 1984) of the 380 Banks (Special Courts), and the Ordinance of Scheduled Banking Companies (LVII of 1962), Section A83 A and B 84 bail, denied the stock in question, was practically in the custody of the accused persons because the same factory was located in the warehouse located in their factory premises, the prosecution had already sold the rice by the accused. Had collected documentary evidence in the form of 12 receipts. During the period when their factory was closed and they could not tell where they sold the rice, the prosecution also gathered evidence about the purchase of straw by the accused in 9000 bags of rice. Did. Do not offer any reason for purchasing large quantities of straw from the market when they were also operating the factory of the same trade company, the investigating officer also included the offense under section 808080 PPC against the accused. The accused, under the circumstances, could not say that the crime was not proved against them, the accused was involved in other fraudulent criminal cases, the trial court had already taken notice of the challan which was ready for trial and decision. There were no suspects at the stage. Entitled to a discount on bail online advocate from Charsada lawyer