Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149, denied the commission's guilt that the accused had been removed from the property owned by the complaining party under the Panchayat Tubewell decision. had gone. And his co-accused complained against the complainant in the matter that at the relevant time he had persuaded his co-accused (his real son) to shoot at the deceased so that the complaining party could have caused them. Revenge for blasphemy. At the time, the accused's presence was unpleasant when Prima's allegations were proved, but another case raised by the lawyer seeking the bail of the accused was the illness as well as the age of the accused, but in a report submitted by the medical officer. It was revealed that he was 60/65 years old. And that although he was TB, was a patient but was being treated in jail, there was no ground for accepting bail, his request for bail was dismissed. online advocate from FR DI Khan lawyer