WAPDA/FESCO THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE FESCO versus TAYYAB TEXTILE MILLS LTD
Sections 42 and 54 were filed in the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RR1, 2, and section 20 suits for the declaration and injunction pending, as well as the approval for a temporary injunction , With which the trial was allowed. The court and the appellate court objected to the trial court's territorial jurisdiction, saying that the aforementioned court lacks legal jurisdiction that the party in the jurisdiction has the right to sue its principal against a corporation. File a case in the office, but in the case of an institution where the cause of action, wholly or in part, has arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of the court, the case shall be established within the jurisdiction of the court, the exclusive jurisdiction of the court Concerning the application, the claimant had the right to set his own price. The other side, declaring and challenging the case, the court seized the matter, will decide the issue in a written statement. The defendants, it was spread that no such objection was raised by them, was a matter of money; the plaintiff suffered no irreparable harm; there was no absolute rule as both the courts had to interfere with the orders. There was no reason. Below, the High Court dismissed the petition against the order
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
