Find a Lawyer

CH. NAZIR AHMED versus MUHAMMAD MAQBOOL

The suit for section 6 and 13 suit pre-occupation was sold by registered sale deed in favor of the plaintiffs / sellers, saying that it had previously been occupied by two sets of pre-emperors who had filed the State Trial Court. Claimed ownership rights as the owner. The appellate court, filed by the appellate court through the appellate court against the trial court's decision, allowed the shopkeepers to reverse the trial court's findings on three counts. First of all, pre-emptors lacked pre-emptive litigation against vendors. Secondly, the Azarpak kings did not submit the required court fees within the time limit, and thus their case will be dismissed under OVII, R11, CPC and thirdly, in the course of this trial. During that time some part of the land was reported. The municipal committee ceased to exist and the vacancy on the suit land on this account ceased to be fully proved by the plaintiffs / pre-emperors of the property, who had purchased the land from a certified allottee, who had full ownership, 16 The boundary of the canal was recorded in the name of the provincial government, objecting to the advice of taxpayers' lawyers that the land involved in the dispute was' arid ancient 'and that it was not paying the land revenue. The record clearly showed that it was a piece of land revenue. It was recorded as `arid ancient ', but the shopkeepers did not provide any evidence to indicate that the land had acquired an urban character or otherwise its agricultural nature had disappeared. how to become a advocate from Kala Bagh lawyer