Find a Lawyer

FALAK SHER versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN

Article 199 Constitutional Applicants Academic Applicants / Candidates' Complaints The LLB's complaint was that in the papers of the Islamic jurisprudence of the LPB (Part 1), 35% of the questions were definite and so were the applicants and the LLBs. Several other candidates (Part I I) were disadvantaged in their positions in the overall results of the examination, fearing that they had tried four questions from the same papers of Islamic jurisprudence which answered the syllabus. One of the questions was in fact the applicant, in the circumstances it cannot be claimed to affect the paper by as much as 35% while some other candidates 17 who potentially had encountered difficulties on documents that were allegedly said, neither he nor the applicant before the High Court and have had a request. There was nothing on record to find out that Mukhtarmanma, either general or special, had to keep the applicant to himself on the extent of his case. The relevant session's spearhead paper was partially outdated, according to the applicant, the final result of the LLB Part II was ready for a declaration within 3/4 days; the applicant, who came to court at a very late stage, It had no certificate. Case Petitioners and others who were allegedly affected by the underwriting papers did not come to the court at the time of filing an application for an authoritative relationship to resolve the complaint. Applicant did not have a case and no petition was filed, it was not in good faith constitutional The requests were rejected in the circumstances. \ R \ n when you need a advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer