RIFFAT MASOOD versus STATE
Section 497 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F bail, the accused's grant was behind bars for eleven months; in both cases the challan was already presented in court, followed by question for further investigation. The question was not whether the accused had cheated the complainant. Two FI rupees, or checks illegally and forcibly taken from the accused, require a deep appreciation of the evidence, which will be done through a trial court record, which the handwriting expert's opinion did not indicate. But the money was deposited on the checks. The same person who kept his signature on the Inquiring Officer's checks should have done so in those cases where it was alleged that the blank check was stolen by the complainant or the accused's signature was forcibly obtained. So the cases against the accused do not fall under the prohibited clause of section 497. Bail bail was granted, CCPC in which bail was generally not barred and bail was not granted as punishment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Hattian lawyer