RANA SHAFIQUE AHMAD versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE
Section 3 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petitioner Applicant's position that he acquired possession of a room in the disputed house after payment of Rs.3,00,000 under the sale agreement with the respondents. Half of the total sales price. And upon apprehending the wrongdoing by the respondents, he filed a civil lawsuit and the civil court passed the order and the respondents arrested him after contacting the police and during his detention, the defendants forcibly. This controversial room occupied by the trial court failed to apply its mind to the original issue as well as to the scope of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, and failed to settle the question as to whether the applicant was a legal source. Was dismissed by the High Court, setting aside the trial court's order directing the petitioner The complaint will be considered pending before the trial court, which will decide after taking full account of the Illegal Settlement Act, 2005 and keeping the entire bench of the petitioner's Supreme Court and High Court suit pending in civil court. Offer a similar view, however, they will not be affected by the current decision. It will be decided on its own merits
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
