Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 324, 337 A (i), 337 F (i) / 337 F (iii) / 34 bail, was denied in the light of the incident and was the accused in the case. ? The alleged crime in the FIR was designated as the original FIR, indicating that the accused had urged Lalkara to shoot his son at the complaining party and that he himself had testified as a prosecution witness. Two wounds were reported in the left fire to the left. In the FIR, the police, along with two injured persons, stood on statements that were already involved in alleged crime before the police Medical evidence, initially the FIR also charged against the accused in the FIR. Supported, obviously, the accused was directly involved in the purpose under which they were involved. The FIR local police had already submitted challan for the offense against the accused under section 242424; PPC attracted the prohibited clause contained in section (1) of section 7497; The grounds existed o Believe the accused's involvement in the alleged crime The bail application was dismissed, in the circumstances. \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
