MST. KANEEZ FATIMA versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, RAWALPINDI
Section 5, Schedule and 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition for litigious articles, care and money for Dwyer, etc. The recovery plaintiff, who filed for divorce from the plaintiff, filed a comprehensive lawsuit against the Dubai articles, care and money for the Dover amount, which was resisted by the defendant on behalf of the defendant / ex-husband suit. Collective claims about marriage restitution, Dwyer, and Doverie articles can only be filed in the dissolution of marriage and otherwise the defendant's dispute was dismissed by the Family Court. By legislature entering section 17 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, the wife was facilitated to substantiate her claim, as in a case where the plaintiff was divorced by the plaintiff. There was no other option, but it was to file a collective lawsuit, claiming that even if an independent case was filed, there would be no family court, but the family court had no choice. Powers were given, in the interest of justice, if such a situation was required, against the interim injunction by the Family Court. The air constitutional petition was not upheld.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Kamalia lawyer