Find a Lawyer

GUL SHER versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH E.D.O.R. TOBA TEK SINDH

Section 12 and 54 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O II, R 2 of the plaintiff's own settlement for the specific performance required to sell the State Land Colonization (Punjab) Act (V of 1912), Section 19 state land. Expecting a pre-litigation injunction is exempt, but then the plaintiff has filed a specific performance of the contract against the application of Bar O II, Rule 2, CPC, in such case where the action will take place. If there is any reason for the aggravation and the merit has been decided and the parties have settled the dispute in the first case. Earlier, in the filing of the previous case, the sole reason for the plaintiff's risk was the risk of dispossession when filing the previous lawsuit, the question of enforcement of the contract was not in the case before when the plaintiff sought a period prior to the execution of the contract. Could not The defendant was not authorized to transfer the suit land through the collector. The plaintiff never gave up the reason for the execution of the contract, which was quite different and there was no connection with the dispute in the previous suit for the order. Both suits came out for various reasons and they had nothing in common. Later, the order of the O II, R2 was independent of the pre-emptive bar, the CPC was no longer applicable for the specific performance of the contract. Suit law websites from Pasroor lawyer