MOEEN-UD-DIN versus STATE
Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Article 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 9 Police Rules, 1934, R25 2 bail, no over-roll grants were charged in the FIR or So the late one was hurt or injured. The complainant's supplemental statement was shown to be present in only one car, which did not even have a co-accused who actually fired at the victim under police rule 1934 KR 25, arrest was not an automatic action. After the investigating officer or the law required Article 9 of the Constitution to allow freedom to be freed only when required under the law, the collective reading of Article 9 of the Constitution and the Police Rules 1934, R25 2 provided some inaccurate material. Requested to submit. Prior to impacting an arrest against an accused, he was deported without bringing any intimidating material against the accused on record without arrest. No such material was available on police-fie. The first person to arrive at the scene complained of himself. The defendant, who had compromised with the accused, had not been recovered from the accused case for further investigation into the accused's guilt. The accused was admitted on bail in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Abdul Hakim lawyer