Article 204 of the contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), sections 3 and 4 of the complaint against the contempt of court, is that the retrial regarding the possession of property approved by the High Court has been violated. The court ruled that the applicant was deposed through the process of implementing the decree passed in favor of the respondent High Court even though restoration of the status quo regarding the applicant's occupation was directed, but it was intended to hang someone else There was no restriction on giving. The High Court refused to take further action in the contempt of court case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
