Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus STATE

The pre-arrest bail of Section 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/148/149, the record has revealed that the accused has been involved in the case ever since the case was registered. ? The investigative process was frustrating and offensive, which was certainly against the objection of the law. It is noteworthy that his advance bail was dismissed on the basis of virtue of his failure to appear before him, after which he proceeded with the High Court on a criminal offense, which resulted in his expulsion. ? Explaining the reason for his non-submission to the High Court, the accused submitted that he could not reach the court on time due to the traffic problem because he was neither found humiliated nor persuaded. However, the accused's lawyer also failed to demonstrate that the event was not proved by a document due to political enmity that he was involved in the case because of police or complainant misconduct, His bail application was rejected to grant pre-arrest bail famous high court advocate from Kasur lawyer