Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM ALIAS SHAKIR versus STATE

Definition of Section 9 (C) Evidence During the trial, sixteen kilograms of hashish was presented, and the Chemical Examiner's report confirmed that it was a narcotic, though no one was there to support the recovery. The public witness was not present in the record, but the facts and circumstances of the testimony presented by the prosecution testified by the prosecutor affected the trust. First, because the prosecution's two witnesses were natural witnesses because the accused was in their custody when it was disclosed and consequently led to the recovery of the drug; secondly, neither during the investigation nor during the investigation. In a statement under Section 342CC, PC suspects have ever proposed an enmity with any of the prosecution witnesses to guarantee that the prosecution was motivated by a riot and that the accused was in his defense. There was no stopping the witness from coming forward and dismissing them in support of their innocence claim not to speak in defense, the defendant himself The defendant was never properly defended and sentenced, his appeal against his conviction and conviction was dismissed \ r \ n female advocates from Ranipur lawyer