ABU BAKKAR versus STATE
Clause 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 467, 468 and 471, denied the accused was not the owner of the disputed property and had no concern with the same accused, claiming to be the wrongful owner of the complainant. Was made and a large sum was received. The complainant was told that the property he did not own was alleged to have used fake and forged copies of the Comprehensive Bond as genuine and that the complainant had suffered wrong and self-harm. Had arrived, the accused could not. His charge of fraud, fraud and forgery was to discharge his duty to determine the accused's guilt or innocence, and it was perfectly logical that the disclosure agency's legal cell had violated the defendant's What was the opinion against? Section 497, CRP's prohibited clause, but still the accused was not entitled to bail because the accused was not satisfied with the issue of truth. Payment of refund to the complainant which he received with fraud. , Was denied bail under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Lower Dir lawyer