Find a Lawyer

BARKAT ALI versus STATE

Definitions of Articles 2?2 (b) and 5 365 are not intended by the prosecution for the purpose, but the testimony of the prosecution is based on the last evidence provided by the sister, the deceased's sister, who was the most important and natural witness. In the presence of which his real brother was taken to an elderly cause, the last not seen evidence at the trial, which would otherwise have been considered a weak type of evidence presented by the prosecution's witnesses, He was neither trustworthy nor believed that the knife was believed to have recovered from an open and unpredictable place that ordinary people could find. Since there was free access to the victim's body was found in the high phase error, Dr. autopsy found no sign of the doctor knife wound in the recovery time of the inspection. Recovery of the theft did not result, interesting witnesses were his witnesses, the recovery of the knife could not be relied upon which no independent was associated with these witnesses, especially when the people at the time of his recovery. Were available, no strong, convincing, direct or indirect evidence was available in any form to link the accused to the crime; highly contradictory and unnatural statements were given by the prosecution's witnesses last seen. There are several missing links to present while the trial court for setting a case based on the evidence of the circumstances. The contentious verdict was set aside, the accused was acquitted of all charges and ordered to be released from jail. registration advocate from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer