Find a Lawyer

MST. SHABANA KAUSAR versus AURANGZEB

Section 497 (2) (5) of the Complaints Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 65 B65 Bail, the cancellation of the application for further investigation against the accused is allegedly filed by the complainant with a delay of fifty days. Was gone and in the meantime the applicant's mother did not take any effort to register a criminal case related to her daughter's abduction / The applicant's record showed that the applicant had left the accused's home. And then he filed a nominated FIR against him. Applicant also filed a private complaint in the court of Senior Civil Judge / Magistrate Section 30 for the dissolved marriage which was pending before the Judge Family Court, in which he confessed to his marriage with the accused Nika Namah. There was no registered document, yet in light of the claim to dissolve the marriage, the applicant admitted the fact of the marriage itself and that fact was yet to be decided by the judge, the Family Court. Regarding whether or not the Nika document was a registered document, the trial court correctly observed that the accused sought further investigation of his crime under section (2) of section 497. The PC was accused of misappropriating the privilege. During the arguments neither the bail plea of the accused was supported by the counsel of the applicant nor any document was produced in the court to prove the bald accusation, hence the trial court's use of the trial court. There is nothing illegal under the arbitrary order made. Cancellation of guarantee law firms from Khanbel lawyer