Find a Lawyer

ABDUL REHMAN versus STATE

The value of the provisions of Sections 302 (b), 337L (ii) and 394 of the victim's right eye were fired by the co-accused, with their own character in the firearm, which has since been filed by the complainant. The victim, who was killed in the handcuffer's brother who was unable to justify his presence at the scene, was a police officer, and records show that all the evidence was merely the result of the retreat. It was reported that the only weapon possessed by one of the three suspects was a .222 bore rifle, but later under section 161 in the Supplementary Statement and Statement, CRP The three suspects were shown with different types of weapons and were given different roles, saying the reforms were formally faced in the cross examination, and that the E prosecution's case was denied. Evidence regarding the recovery of vacancies presented by the witnesses was inconsistent, so many people from the area gathered there at the relevant time, but no one was involved in the independent witness recovery process, which was against section 103. The CRPC only recovered the motorcycle's number plate at the accused's request, but the motorcycle attempted to snatch it was neither recovered by chance nor the FIR lodged unnecessary consideration from the accused. After deliberation and consultation, the evidence of the prosecution itself was controversial, and conspiracies were underway on the surface and the prosecutor failed to establish his case against any of the suspects, leading to the trial. Set aside the verdict of the convicts approved in the court divorce advocates from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer