Find a Lawyer

MAULVI TAHIR ASIM versus STATE

Section 295C Testimony of Evidence The benefit of the doubt was complained to the police for an eight-day delay and no explanation regarding the complainant's statement was recorded, it could be said that an FIR could be filed late. After proper consideration and consultation, the evidence presented by the prosecution did not affect the trust because it did not come from unforgivable sources and the evidence presented by the prosecution in support of this case was not true. The eyewitness was not with the Sunni faith, while the accused's relatives seemed to deviate from the story altogether, and one of the defendants denied the statement before the trial court and took the oath of the text. After the open court also denied that the accused could not be charged. The humiliating remarks about the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) were always forgiving and merciful. A suspect was acquitted of the charge by the benefit of doubt and directed to be released. female advocates from Bolan lawyer