Find a Lawyer

RUSTAM KHAN versus ZARI TARIQIATI BANK LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER

Sections 9, 10 and 22 leave suit for claimant's claim for interpretation of the account The plaintiff had passed an order / injunction approved by the Banking Court, under which his account clearance case was dismissed. , The contents of the order indicate that the defendant filed for leave for defense, but then failed to show that the contents of the order were not clear whether the leave was granted or not. , Or even when the leave application is considered in the Legal Status Section 10 (8) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001. The Banking Court will consider the contents of the Plaintiff, after the application for leave to defend and respond was not such, the prerequisites of the law were not fulfilled, the appeal by the High Court, the impugned order and the decree separately. Was decided by the banking court to decide. Leave the application as required by law and, after that, if the leave is granted, it will implement the procedure as included in Section 10 (10) of the Financial Institute. ION (Financial Recovery) Ordinance, 2001 famous high court advocate from Allahabad lawyer