Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus STATE

Definition of Section 2302 (b) of the evidence was mentioned in the instant filing of the accused's name with the role played by him during the incident; both witnesses were residents of the same area as a prosecutor. According to the witness's testimony, the mansion was located 2 acres away from the scene of the incident. Both witnesses described their presence on the spot, and they had no previous hostility or hatred that he had taken the incident. I have to trap him in a false way, leaving him the real culprit. The crime, which was a minor incident in the day and there was no possibility of misidentifying the criminal motive established by the prosecution, shows that there is some dispute between the parties on this matter, but there is no civil dispute between the parties. The suit was not pending and he had not been involved in it before. Criminal litigation witnesses cannot be called witnesses of interest only in circumstances because of the close relationship the accused had with them, both witnesses testified at that time, place and incident. Provided constant statements about how, the two witnesses had clearly stated that the accused alone had hit the gunmen with a hatchet. The deceased medical evidence also had full support for ocular accounts and could not be contradicted by medical evidence. Both eyewitnesses have long been subjected to cross-examination, but the prosecutor's story raised suspicion. Nothing could be achieved by defense to do so. The release of the co-accused was not enough to follow the prosecution's story online advocate from Upper Dir lawyer