Find a Lawyer

MALIK MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus SH. MUHAMMAD AMJAD

Section 33, 35 and 38 of the Arbitration Act (X of 1940), sections 16 and 17 petition for the court to create an award roll The respondent filed an application for the award roll to be made in court. The applicant raised the objection that an inadequate seal of the award had been registered, which proved that the defendant was given twice the opportunity to make good the reduction of stamp duty on the award, but before the trial court could not be convinced. The directive was not complied with and the court's request for an award roll was rejected. Through the trial court, the appellate court took action to excuse the error in which the trial court twice overturned the clear direction of the appellate court, without the use of appropriate judicial mind and taking into account the defendant's proportionality. He also did not care about section 35 and the investigation. 38 of the Stamp Act, 1899, which explicitly stated that there was insufficient seal registration document, under the evidence was an undisputed appeal court, which failed to examine the mandatory provisions of Sections 35 and 38 of the Stamp Act 1899 , Had committed material unlawful proceedings, and the order passed by the appellate court was set aside and sent to the trial court. Below to reconsider the relevant law on this topic immigration advocates from Raiwind lawyer