MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus STATE
The testimony of section 2 (2 (b)) was related to the lack of conviction in the events of the day and the parties who knew each other well, to the eyewitness testimony regarding the accused's misidentification, although against the accused accused. There was no prior prejudice. Including it in a false case The presence of witnesses at the scene of the incident was a natural matter, which was also presented by the immediately-filed FIR. Minor contradictions were not in the evidence directly. Medical evidence was supported by the evidence and the circumstances of the case are presented to the accused. C evidence was not supported in these circumstances the culprit of the accused was retained. The motive established in the FIR was not proved in the trial. There was no serious rivalry between the victim and the accused. Year after he was angry over a minor issue, he shot a man in the back of his body. The firefighter was not repeated to ensure the death of the accused. I was imprisoned for life
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Karak lawyer
