Appealing to Section 18 (a) (c) (G) and the accused's accountability court, the jurisdiction of the appellants was not presented as an accused in the reference filed by the National Accountability Bureau, but the accountability court had regarded them as accused. Asked that there was never any litigation or investigation. The appeals made by the National Accountability Bureau and in the references / sub-references, were filed after investigation and investigation by the National Accountability Bureau and the name of the appellants could not be found. The authority was not to add or hold new persons to the list of accused. Investigate or substitute your opinion of the investigating officer authorized under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999; no notice was issued by the Accountability Court before issuing a non-bailable warrant against the appellants and it was in accordance with the principles of natural justice. Was against when the law requires something special. In a particular way, it must be a d. In this manner and in any way, the High Court rejected the order passed by the Accountability Court, as it was section 18 (a), (c) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999. And (g) the provisions of the Act were adverse, which would result in action against the Appellant. Appeal to the circumstances was allowed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
