Section 417 (2) of an appeal against a breach of interference scope order can only be intervened if it is found on the face of a false, oblique, arbitrary nature, or based on a misrepresentation of evidence. And was artificial, arbitrary, and led to a fair miscarriage of justice, the exclusion of techniques in a criminal trial as a result of injustice, was not enough to intervene; Instead, the double doctrine of innocence was associated with the ruling that when examining the verdict of facts, the lower courts' results should be given considerable weight, allowing the accused to be exempt from the commission of the crime. Gone, it would be unbelievable when it cannot be said that he was evil. Whether the verdict was badly wrong, or wrong, whenever there is a suspicion of the defendant's guilt, the benefit must reach the accused, and the court can fill in the lacunae that appear in the prosecution's evidence. The prosecution will never come to an end as it will. Contrary to established principles of criminal justice provision
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
