Defendant's reasoning for the determination of the Civil Court Bar Points determination of section 161 land grant was that the appellate court did not set points for the determination, as well as the lawsuit filed against the designated order. That was fired by the Executive District Officer (Revenue). ) The order may be further banned, but no such benefit was obtained before the Revenue Section of the Civil Court was barred from the jurisdiction, as already in the case under the Revenue Rules. I had to end treatment that had not happened yet. The civil court was the court of final jurisdiction and the matter was finalized through the Revenue Forum, before the same appellate court was bound to devise points for the determination of the parties' case, through an appellate court. The points for the determination made were so sheer. The trial court did not cover the whole matter. The record that was kept for the purpose of measuring land in the dispute can be found by the courts. The courts may ask the relevant records for managing justice, and they should look into these reports. There was no need to close and accept that both the lower courts acted sarcastically. A review of the cases approved by both the courts below was accepted
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
