Find a Lawyer

INAM ULLAH KHAN versus STATE

Section 9 (c) The prosecution case was full of doubts about the definition of evidence, and there were material contradictions in the statements of the prosecutor's witnesses when they were presented as prosecution witnesses after completing the required formal proceedings. He drafted the sender himself. He took a different stance, saying that under his dictation, Murcella was drafted by the complainant's subordinate stance that he sought the coach himself and was there during the search process. Compensating all passengers, the complainant was denied the statement of the prosecutor's witness. Who said [that only the driver of the coach was uncontrollable and that the marijuana was recovered during the search of the vehicle when no passenger was found nor searched because the prosecution witnesses It was enough to prevent such contradiction in the statements of the prosecution. The accused failed to return to the trial court's home, in the circumstances, failed to properly examine the evidence presented on the record, the contentious verdict of the defendant's conviction was not based on reasonable reasoning and the evidence on record was taken by the trial court. Was not properly appreciated by, the prosecutor was unable to prove his case. The accused will go in favor of the accused, without reasonable doubt, he was acquitted of the charge and sentenced, and he was acquitted of the charge against him. famous lower court advocate from Sanghi lawyer