REHMAT ZAMAN versus STATE
The Judicial Magistrate issued a search warrant in this case under section 497 Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), section 9 (c) and 20 bail, while strictly sought under section 20 under the law. Had to go Control of the Narcotic Substance Act 1997, and it was the special court, which had to issue a search warrant, finding any violation of the law would have to make the search illegal because the site's plan shows From where the alleged recovery was made, there was a house surrounded by the population, but none of the public was involved in the recovery process, the prosecutor attached a record two FIs, and on the FI statement The State Council argued that the defendant was involved in drug trafficking, not entitled to bail privileges. The filing of an FIR against the accused will not remove the accused from the privileges of bail because the prosecution was admitted to bail in the court of competent jurisdiction for the advertisement, to prove the accused's guilt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Khanbel lawyer