DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BANNU versus MUHAMMAD SUBHAN
Section 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXXXX, R 1, 2, also sought to temporarily issue a restraining order against the accused with the defendant prosecuting the suit so that he could enter any Avoid interrupting the suit shop in any way. The trial court ordered six months to retain the status quo or dismiss the suit, whichever was the first temporary injunction unless it was extended and the reasons were due to be recorded and the High Court There is no indication that the record is informed in the same way that the ad interim injunction submitted to the trial court was automatically terminated after a period of six months and in fact when there was no support, the defendant No order was issued by the plaintiff in this case, nor was it extended to the plaintiffs for further extension. Or requested. Ad Transition Order Prohibition Order, Review Request was invalid and was rejected
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Jaja Abasian lawyer