GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. versus HAMAYUN TAJ
O VII, R 2 In the interest of the plaintiffs, the defendant performed the topographic survey of the villages for the defendants and submitted a claim for the work, but he could not receive the claim amount as well as periodically reed the order. The burden of proof in relation to the rules, rules, terms and conditions of the oral agreement reached by the trial and appellate courts was reached between the plaintiffs and the defendants in the interest of the defendant, which he failed to expunge and return. Had failed to occur. Evidence Even if the contractor was contracted in writing to issue an estimate cost and work order, but if he was instructed to do additional work during the execution of the work, he would be entitled to compensation. However, even if written decisions and court orders were based on nothing in writing, the evidence on record could not be appreciated and interfered with. The revision request with the edition was, in the circumstances, dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Kunjah lawyer
