Find a Lawyer

ARAB KHAN versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR JAVED

Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXXVII, Rr 2 and 3 Conversation Instrument Defendant's claim that the alleged document did not meet the promise of the plaintiff's suit was a trial suit. The litigation was avoided by the defendant was not denied by the defendants even though the terms of the promise clause were met or the execution of the promise note was not challenged by the defendant, Evidence was not fully discussed by the trial court, no misuse, non-reading or misinterpretation of evidence. Was not pointed out. The defendant's trial court pronounced the judgment for good reasons

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• Khawaja MUHAMMAD SHAHID 2014 CLC 599
• REDTONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLD 601
• Chaudhry MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Revenue, Hyderabad 2014 YLR 602
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID SIDDIQUI v. MUHAMMAD MANZAR ALAM QADRI 2014 MLD 604
• MAZHAR MUHAMMAD v. N.E.D. UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 2014 PLC(CS) 607
• QAZI alias DOST MUHAMMAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 611
• Chaudari SHABBIR HUSSAIN v. State 2014 PTD 612
• Haji NASARULLAH v. State 2014 MLD 617

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

famous lower court advocate from Rabwah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes