Find a Lawyer

KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD SHAHID versus

Sections 278 and 372 of the Letter of Administration were disposed of regularly by the son of the victim in connection with the deceased's son's application for immovable property and immovable property, and two independent witnesses also took oath. The names were sworn in. Except that there were no other legal heirs of the deceased except the legal heirs of the persons present before the court also submitted affidavits of any objection in favor of the victim's son / son, the matter was disputed and in such cases , The application was granted and the applicant was ordered to give a Letter of Administration in connection with the property and the property left by the victim, the applicant was offered a guaranteed conditional,

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• ABDUL AZIZ v. State 2014 YLR 584
• ALI SHER v. State 2014 MLD 591
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, KARACHI v. ALLIED RENTAL MODARABA 2014 PTD 593
• Mst. REEMA v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION DARRI, LARKANA 2014 PLD 598
• REDTONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLD 601
• Chaudhry MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Revenue, Hyderabad 2014 YLR 602
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID SIDDIQUI v. MUHAMMAD MANZAR ALAM QADRI 2014 MLD 604
• ARAB KHAN v. MUHAMMAD AKHTAR JAVED 2014 CLD 606

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

online advocate from Shahdad Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes