Find a Lawyer

GULZAR BEGUM versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

The Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 Section 10 PTD petitioned in their favor that the applicant had purchased the disputed land, which he had deemed to be a fake, with the Deputy Settlement Commissioner approving any eviction order. It was not an option to abolish the withdrawal rules and to fulfill them without any opportunity. The petitioner was heard, stopped, the matter was not a PTD cancellation, but a case where the Settlement Record passenger had announced that he had a claim for transfer of the transfer to PTD according to the permanent transfer record. Is being relied upon. The property was a fake PTD holder did not challenge the entire Khasra number in the disputed order in which the disputed one was declared as Katchi Settlement, neither declared Katchi Settlement nor granted rights to the land given to different persons. Was challenged by the applicant No case was made out for intervention law firms from Panjgur lawyer